Council votes "no" on anti-discrimination bill

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 8/15/2012 11:43 pm
JACKSONVILLE, Fla. -- The Jacksonville City Council has just voted no to the anti-discrimination bill.

The vote on bill 2012-296 was 17 - 2 in opposition for the bill, described as the human rights ordinance. The bill would have banned discrimination based on sexual orientation. It was meant to change the current anti-discrimination law to reflect the rights of gay and lesbian people in the community.

The bill was heavily debated over the past couple of months. There was a lot of opposition, but several well-known local politicians offered their support in favor of the bill. 

For the full reaction, tune in to FOX30 Action News at 10 p.m. for the latest on the story.
Share
13 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Action News Jacksonville

MrCitizen - 8/16/2012 2:37 PM
0 Votes
Oh Well...........

Jeff D - 8/16/2012 12:37 PM
4 Votes
If this law wasn't needed we wouldn't be fighting for equal rights and protections under the law.I've been told by a judge from the FDIC that there are no laws protecting the LGBT community,because they discriminated against him right here in this city and executive order 13087 is apparently meaningless to the federal government too,why don't all the churchs and people against this rethink there stand because discrimination is still discrimination and the worst kind is hiding behind a religon,why don't they lose there tax expemt status for making such statements any 501-c-3 non-profit would lose all there beifits if they spoke out publicly on a poltical issue or discrimnated like this,so all i can say about the city council is that they are a bunch of racsists and reading some of these post this city will never be any more than what it is,a very discriminatory city,are ya'll going to start attacking other religions next because they are different from your own?

RiverRat - 8/16/2012 11:55 AM
0 Votes
The problem with the Bill would be the unintended consequences, for example if an employer had 2 employees and one who was straight had been employed for 5 years and the other who happened to be gay had been there for 4 years, who do you think would lose their job if the employer had to reduce staff for financial reasons. Most likely it would be the straight person due to fear that the gay person would claim discrimination under the proposed bill.

jaxfldon - 8/16/2012 9:37 AM
1 Vote
angels072258, Maybe you should be a better Christian and pray for the end of famine, homelessness, war or disease

jacksonville21 - 8/16/2012 3:23 AM
0 Votes
Love how this site calls it "voting "NO" on anti-discrimination bill". In actuality, it is voting no against an unnecessary law.

xebob - 8/16/2012 12:09 AM
0 Votes
A problem I see is that people are told they are not suppose to judge, yet something like this forces them to make a judgement regarding gay behavior. It's not a judgement say on whether certain gays make good neighbors or are nice people. This bill forces one to focus on people's sexuality only. The Jacksonville City Council was forced to make a judgement about gay sexuality and it made it.

Texas Pete - 8/15/2012 10:43 PM
1 Vote
The City Council did the correct thing. There are already enough laws to cover just about anything you can think of,and if you don't like something, you can always find a lawyer willing to sue for you.

jimharvey1 - 8/15/2012 10:15 PM
0 Votes
What were they thinking??? I would have liked to have been a fly on the wall to hear the discussion before that vote! I find it had to believe that the Jacksonville city council is collectively a group of homophobes that don't feel an individual should be protected legally from discrimination due to sexual preference. They wouldn't have ay problem approving it if it pertained to Discrimmination based on religion. Both are individual choices. Many will even argue that homosexuality is not chosen, but in fact genetically determined. If that is true, why would the rights of gays be any dfferent than minority discrimination?

angels072258 - 8/15/2012 9:25 PM
3 Votes
Amen, Amen, Amen!. God answered our prayers

grumpyoldman - 8/15/2012 8:54 PM
3 Votes
GOOD! These "IDENTITY CHALLENGED" people don't need rights... They need "HELP"! Take them to the nearest mental health facility!
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.