Florida needs to decide how to proceed after health care ruling

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 6/29/2012 6:46 pm
JACKSONVILLE, Fla. -- It is now time for Florida Governor Rick Scott to rethink his initial decision on the health care overhaul. Governor Scott says he does not support it. But if he chooses not to comply, Florida will likely remain in third place for having the most uninsured people in the nation.

There are more than three and a half million uninsured Americans living in the Sunshine State. That's 21 percent of Florida's population. And now, Governor Scott has to decide what to do about them.

"Florida is now faced with a choice as is every other state and the choice is this: we do not have to accept the funding that comes with the expansion of the medicaid act," said Jennifer Millis with Florida Coastal School of Law.

In the past, the Governor has ordered the state not to accept federal money to implement the law. He's rejected or returned more than $110 million.

But now that the Supreme Court had it's say, it is back to the drawing board. Millis says the state gets a shot at changing it's decision.

"Before yesterday the question was if they decided not to do that would they lose all their medicaid funding? That was a big issue before but the Supreme Court said and believe unanimously no you can't do that."

Because Governor Scott didn't think this would be the end result, Millis says Florida is now potentially behind in preparing for how to proceed.

"My concern is that Governor Scott is not going to do anything until after the November election with the hopes that a new congress and potentially new president would strike down the entire thing so they don't have to comply. It's a risky proposition to wait because time is of the essence because part of the act is going to start kicking in."

Millis says another option Florida has is to call a special session. She doesn't think that's probable before the election but says that may be the best way to decide how the state should move forward.

There is no clear deadline yet as to when states have to make their final decision. Millis tells Action News she expects the Department of Health and Human Services to start giving states guidelines as to when to opt in our out soon.
Share
1 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Action News Jacksonville

Kayla - 6/30/2012 9:00 AM
1 Vote
Florida should stick with its original decision to opt out. We were told that this "mandate" would help the poor for "free" health care and no one with pre-exsisting conditions would be turned away. Now we learn its a tax and you will be fined for not complying. So the poor will get fined, "taxed" for not doing what the government decide is best for you. Not that it is right for you. No, I agree no one will be turned away, but they didn't say that you will get the treatment you need. Just the one now that the government thinks you need. There is nothing Free in life. What are we now giving up so that the government can controls your health, not you. If you don't agree with there diagnosis and want a second opinion will you be fined for not following what they think is best for you? Ops, you can't, you now don't have a choice.
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.