First Alert Weather Alert: Flood Warning expires at 8:00 AM on 4/18, issued at 10:44 AM Bryceville, FL | Callahan, FL | Fernandina Beach, FL | Glen Saint Mary, FL

Tax rate could rise with more than $10M in amendments

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Updated: 9/24/2013 6:33 pm
JACKSONVILLE, Fla. (WOKV) -- The city will decide Tuesday exactly what property tax rate will be set for next year. However the changes are likely not done.

A public records request submitted by WOKV shows there have been 36 floor amendments submitted to the Office of the General Counsel as of call of business Monday. These will be up for debate Tuesday night during City Council's vote on the final budget.

"The temptation to spend that money is always there because everything we do is certainly judged to be, at least by some segment of society, necessary and worthwhile or needed," says City Council President Bill Gulliford.

Last year, the council considered fewer than 10 amendments on the final night of debate because there was no tax hike being considered, so there was no money to allocate. This year is different.

Jacksonville's Finance Committee has crafted a budget that raises your property tax rate roughly 12%, which generates about $51 million to use toward the General Fund. The full council voted a few months ago to allow the rate to rise as much as 15%, generating $65 million. That leaves roughly $14 million that could still be used to fund more departments or programs.

"This is going to be unique to the process, because we haven't been in this position for many years," Gulliford said.

If all amendments were approved, it would require an additional $10,662,528. That would bring your property tax rate near the maximum hike allowed. There are two amendments that would also put money back in what's called the special council contingency or account of money that will be balanced by raising the tax rate. Those two amendments combined total $786,960. Not all of the 36 amendments deals with money that impacts your tax rate, the above sum reflects 28 amendments which impact the council contingency.

We asked Gulliford how comfortable he was that taxpayers would see their rate climb as little as possible.

"How comfortable am I? I'm not that comfortable, because anytime people see things that need to be done and that there's still money available, there's going to be great pressure to do that," he said.

But regardless of the final rate that is set, Gulliford said he is proud of his fellow council members who supported a tax rate hike -- largely considered a tough political stance -- because he said they saw instead the investment the community truly needed.
4 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Action News Jacksonville

c9bcrewman - 9/24/2013 9:51 PM
0 Votes
it go's back year's ago. the spending of a $350 million dollar court house. who was responsible for it? a lot of money wasted and could of got some relief for the poor taxpayer's in jax. if people would not run red light's you wouldn't need the camera's. common sense will tell you that. look at all the people when you are driving and see the people who do not stop and go thru the red light on right turn on red. speeding and not using turn signal's and cutting people off are a serious problem. when you took your driving test you didn't run a stop sign or run a red light or speed. people think now you can drive however they want. not all driver's are like that.

Realchange - 9/24/2013 6:15 PM
1 Vote
Fact is red light camera's going up are not about safety it's about more money. Tax increase but has the average worker seen any pay raises in the past 8 years? ANYONE ON the council that votes for a tax hike on middle class homes should be sent walking and hold immediate recall elections. If they try to block that get a law on the books that council members can be recalled by the voters per voter referendum. 12 percent increase is insane considering the economy.

Papakilo - 9/24/2013 5:46 PM
1 Vote
I will not vote for any member who supports a tax increase. The CITY NEEDS to CUT it's FAT as well as the MAYOR's projects. I think all Jacksonville appointed and elected positions are over paid. Stop picking on city maintenance and safety personnel, start by taking a 20% cut in administration personnel pay and benefits. I am sick of threats by the mayor and city council to cut personnel under the administration level. Let's see REAL fat and waste cut at the administration level. My two cents.

warpsix - 9/24/2013 3:00 PM
1 Vote
Stop Spending
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.